Group Dynamics

As usual, each time I venture around Backreaction, I find something interesting to read. This time, it’s Bee’s musing about group dynamics. She states that in every group, there is a soul, a brain, a heart and an asshole. They are not necessarily separate people, sometimes one person may combine two or more functions.

As usual with any classification, you often find the limits. I believe that Bee is mostly referring to groups in movies or books, to the kind of dynamics that makes a plot interesting. But even then, you often find other parallel classifications, for instance hero + heart + comic relief, or good + bad + ugly, and so on…

Application to programming teams

In programming teams, I think that the same kind of classification applies. It is not necessarily exactly the same pattern, however. In most programming teams, for instance, you don’t care much about having a heart. You do care about having a soul and a brain. And generally, you also need a “benevolent dictator“, or maybe a “general”, i.e. someone who thinks about the organization of the project. I don’t want to call this person a “manager”, because in my experience, it is very rarely a manager doing that job.

The relevant observation Bee makes is that, in general, you don’t need more than these few people. A plot with 20 all-equal people is not generally much worse than a plot with 4 main characters. Similarly, programming teams are most efficient when they are small and focused. As soon as the team grows, you need a clear hierarchical organization, so that each subteam remains around 5 people. Equalitarian programming teams rarely work efficiently. In general, the hierarchy establishes itself based on historical and productivity precedence, as illustrated by many open-source teams, most notably the Linux kernel team.

It seems to be a pretty general rule. If you look at the large companies, they were usually created by a very small group of complementary people (I made random guesses for the role attribution):

  • Steve Jobs (soul), Steve Wozniak (brain), Mike Markkula (general) for Apple
  • Bill Gates (soul), Paul Allen (brain), Steve Ballmer (general) for Microsoft
  • Scott McNealy (soul), Bill Joy (brain), Vinod Koshla (general) for Sun Microsystems
About these ads

One thought on “Group Dynamics

  1. Wouldn’t it be also possible to assume, that this is a self-organizing process? So that these are role-models that are being acted out in any group that works together. The corners of the work-space, so to speak, into which the participants somehow gravitate.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s